This will be a three-hour-per-week course on natural language ontology
Time: Thursdays 14h-17h, sometimes Fridays 9h-12h
Start: September 17, 2026
Room: B122 Bâtiment Egger, Campus Schuman
Program
Sessions:
September 17, 2026: in person only
September 17:
Introduction; Ontology, Semantics, and Syntax
handout
- What is ontology, what is metaphysics?
- How does ontology relate to natural language?
- The ways of involvement of objects in the semantics of natural language: referential NPs, anaphora, implicit arguments, parameters of evaluation
- The importance of ontology for syntax and vice versa
- What sorts of linguistic data display the ontology implicit in natural language? A first look at the core-periphery distinction
Essential reading (further reading recommendations on the handout):
F. Moltmann, 2022: “Natural Language Ontology,“ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Additional (optional) zoom meetings in September and October TBA soon
September 24: no class
October 1: no class
October 15: no class
online ZOOM meeting: https://univ-cotedazur.zoom.us/j/82421124087?pwd=kbieQTJJtbrPQQBarnbNF9Pkl0PrP4.1
October 22:
14h-16h
Class via ZOOM: https://univ-cotedazur.zoom.us/j/88000254402?pwd=zE1cPpSGiPD3n09KysmaRjlTpAiABN.1
Reference and Predication
handout
- Referential and other NPs
- The argument structure of predicates
- Predicates and properties
- The Fregean criterion of objecthood
- Potential problems for the view that referential NPs stand for objects
Recommended readings:
Davidson, D., 1967, “The Logical Form of Action Sentences,” in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic
of Decision and Action, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 81–95.
Fine, K., 1982, “Acts, Events and Things”, in Leinfellner, W. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the
6th International Wittgenstein Symposium: Language and Ontology 8, Wien, Austria:
H¨older-Pichler-Tempsky, 97–105.
Kim, J., 1976, “Events as Property Exemplifications”, in M. Brand and D. Walton (eds.),
Action Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel, 310-326.
Link, G., 1983, “The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Nouns,” in R. Baeuerle et al.
(eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, Berlin: Springer, 302-323.
October 23:
10h-12h
Class via ZOOM: https://univ-cotedazur.zoom.us/j/88000254402?pwd=zE1cPpSGiPD3n09KysmaRjlTpAiABN.1
Quantification
handout
- Quantification in logic and in natural language
- Quantification and ontological commitment
- Adverbial quantification
- ‘Non-nominal’ or special quantification
Recommended readings:
Moltmann, F. (2003): 'Nominalizing Quantifiers'. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32(5), 445-481
Nebel, J. (2019): ‘Hopes, Fears, and other grammatical scarecrows’. Philosophical Review,
Rieppel, M. (2016): ‘Being something: Properties and predicative quantification’. Mind 125(499).
Rosefeldt, T. (2008): ‘That’-clauses and non-nominal quantification’. Philosophical Studies, 137: 301–333.
October 29: semester break, no class
November 6 (Friday!):
10h-12h
Class via ZOOM: https://univ-cotedazur.zoom.us/j/88000254402?pwd=zE1cPpSGiPD3n09KysmaRjlTpAiABN.1
https://univ-cotedazur.zoom.us/j/88000254402?pwd=zE1cPpSGiPD3n09KysmaRjlTpAiABN.1
Implicit arguments
handout
- Event semantics and its alternatives
- Other implicit arguments in the semantic literature
- Implicit arguments and light silent nouns
- Syntactic constraints on implicit arguments
- Implicit and explicit arguments: distinction in ontological commitment?
Recommended reading:
Davidson, D., 1967, “The Logical Form of Action Sentences,” in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logicof Decision and Action, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 81–95.
Moltmann, F. 2025. 'Events in Contemporary Semantics'. In James Bahoh, Marta Cassina, and Sergio Genovesi (eds): 21st-Century Philosophy of Events: Beyond the Analytic / Continental Divide. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
November 12:
Tense and Modality
- Some basics of modal logic and modality in natural language
- Some basics of the semantics of tense
- Ontological commitment to possible worlds or situations: extending the range of criteria
- Ontological commitment to times
November 13:
Nonexistent objects
- Contexts of apparent referential NPs not standing for actual objects
- Existence predicates and intentional verbs
- Meinongianism and other approaches to apparent non-referring ‘referential’ NPs
- Restrictions on the availability of non-existent objects in the semantics
November 20:
Syntactic categories and ontology
- Ontological and grammatical categories
- Older view about the correlations of ontological and syntactic categories
- Crosslinguistic challenges
- Challenges from recent syntactic theories
November 21:
Parts and Wholes in Semantics 1
- Extensional mereology
- Plural reference
November 27
Parts and Wholes in Semantics 2
- Non-extensional mereology
- Abstract wholes
December 3:
Chomsky’s Challenges to Referentialist Semantics
- Phenomena of apparently incompatible copredication
- Semantic and ontological approaches to problems of co-predication
- What sorts of semantic values can and cannot be ‘real things’?
- Conceptions of reality in philosophy
- The individuation of artifacts and related things
December 10:
The Ontological Core-Periphery Distinction
- The motivations for the core-periphery distinction
- How should the distinction bet characterized content-wise?
- How is the distinction linguistically grounded?
- How does the distinction relate to Chomsky’s core-periphery distinction?